Local Rule §2.04(a) - Ex Parte Relief
From CaseyPedia
July 9th 2007: in this post on IAFF, Casey Googles for legal advice with satisfyingly smug results.
Casey, clearly unrepresented despite his recent talk with a lawyer, does a little "research" of his own and turns up an article written by Judge Loren McMaster, the judge who will hear LossMitPro's complaint. After selectively quoting from the article, he ends on a subtle sneer:
- I’m very glad we have such a system in California (and probably other states). This could really come in handy when somebody is under “true unavoidable emergency” and there is immenant threat of “irreparable harm”. As if, maybe somebody’s life is in danger or something else serious like that.
- I sure wouldn’t want to place extra burden on the courts and waste tax dollars on anything other than that. I don’t know who would. I guess we’ll find out tomorrow.
[edit] Reactions
On caseyhaterz, Schnapps points out a section in McMaster's article that Casey neglected:
- Bear in mind that it is helpful to the court to have opposition papers to review, so an effort should be made to prepare such. If possible, all papers, moving and opposing, should be submitted to the court the afternoon prior to the ex parte appointment.
She concludes: "Sounds an awful lot like work."[1]
[edit] Links
- Local Rule §2.04(a) - Ex Parte Relief, IAFF, July 9th 2007
- Ex Parte Relief: What You Always Wanted To Know But Were Afraid To Ask, Judge Loren McMaster, Sacramento Lawyer: Civil Law and Motion Notes, July/August 2004
[edit] References
- ↑ Something Casey probably missed..., posting by Schnapps on caseyhaterz.com, July 9th 2007 at 9:20 pm
| Previous post: Listening to Legal Advice | IAFF Posts | Next post: Big News To Come Tomorrow… |
